Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.05.9811141019460.337-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA  (Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA  (Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > >Current FE/BE protocol seems pretty optimized to me, but you should know
> > >the best.  Seems like a waste to try and get it to match some standard,
> > 
> > Well, I suppose you could make the same argument about SQL-92 compliance.
> > 
> > Standards compliance is useful because it plugs you into the positive-
> > feedback cycle of product development.  Your product works with more 
> > products, more people use your product, more products are developed which
> > work with your product, etc.
> 
> Not really the same.  There are end-user visible changes, and
> developer-visible changes.
From how things sound, I think that implementing Corba will be the
trigger for 7.0...:)

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA