On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
> Make the first column with the current table headers. In the second column
> the content.
You lost me on that one...the way I'm reading it, you are suggesting going
further across the screen? Or do you mean do one site per table, each
table vertical from the other? If so, that would take up alot more to
dosnload then the current coniguration...
BTW...what do you mean by 'it doesn't fit very well in netscape'? I don't
use anything but it, and I just have to scroll right for what is
missing...
> > -Egon >
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, is it possible to reduce the number of columns to two or three. It
> > > doesn't fit very well in netscape
> >
> > If you wish to suggest a good layout that will allow for the same amount
> > of information in less columns, I'm all ears...I couldn't figure out one
> > :)
>
