Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew N. Dodd
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.3.96.980610032348.17992I-100000@sasami.jurai.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Quite and analysis.  I want to comment on the code more, but I just want
> to point out now that many of our i386 platforms are not GNU.  I think
> we have to use macros.  I can't think of any GNU-specific code in the
> source tree at this point, and I don't think it makes sense add it now
> just to make the code look a litter cleaner.

Indeed.  Those of use who have thousand dollar SunPro compilers thank you.

(can you say progressive optomizer?)

/*
   Matthew N. Dodd        | A memory retaining a love you had for life
   winter@jurai.net        | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to
   http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53
*/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
Next
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention