Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.3.96.980602123151.12843K-100000@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report  (David Hartwig <daveh@insightdist.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report  ("Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac@bo.nettuno.it>)
List pgsql-interfaces
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, David Hartwig wrote:

> > O.S.: We choose Linux for his proved reliability.

    *quiet snicker*

> > 2.  As PostgreSQL doesn't allow an "ORDER BY" on columns not
> > included in the target list of the "SELECT", (I know that it is
> > SQL/92 standard, but IMO it's a fool thing), therefore, is not possible
> > to  have the "dynaset "sorted for any field that is different from
> > the key (in our case the useless OIDs).
> >
>
> This fix is in alpha and will be in the 6.4 release.  I do not know when
> 6.4 is slated for release, but I am willing to send you a patch if it is
> critical for you to proceed.

    6.4 is slated for Oct 1st...we had thought Sep 1st, except that,
being the tail end of the summer, alot of ppl tend to be in limbo



pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report