Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.3.96.980201182256.12562U-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Has anyone seen the jdbc patch I posted earlier today?
> > >
> > > If not, I'll ftp it.
> >
> >     I haven't seen it...send me a copy directly?  The mailing lists
> > have '# of lines' limits to messages, which may have been where it got
> > lost...
>
> Wonder what the limit is?  Let me find out by trial and error... :-)

    I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had
increased hackers, but just switched it around:

    # maxlength            [integer] (40000) <resend,digest>
    # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When
    # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if
    # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters.
maxlength           =   4000000

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?