Re: Hard problem with concurrency - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ron Mayer
Subject Re: Hard problem with concurrency
Date
Msg-id POEDIPIPKGJJLDNIEMBEKEHJCDAA.ron@intervideo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hard problem with concurrency  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
FWIW, that's the approach O*'s taking.  http://otn.oracle.com/products/oracle9i/daily/Aug24.html

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Cc: Tom Lane; Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hard problem with concurrency 


Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> REPLACE INTO anyone? ;)

The upcoming SQL 200x standard includes a MERGE command that appears to
fulfill that purpose.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql and oracle, compatibility assessment
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL replay logic (was Re: [PERFORM] Mount options for