Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory than psql client - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From James Pang (chaolpan)
Subject Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory than psql client
Date
Msg-id PH0PR11MB5191A047B707B2FE6527C549D67F9@PH0PR11MB5191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory than psql client  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-performance

  We run same update or delete SQL statement “ DELETE FROM … WHERE … “  the table is a hash partition table (256 hash partitions). When run the sql from Postgresql JDBC driver, it soon increased to 150MB memory (RES filed from top command),       but when run the same SQL from psql , it only consumes about 10MB memory.  UPDATE statements is similar , need 100MB memory, even it delete or update 0 rows.  Any specific control about Postgresql JDBC driver ?

 

Thanks,

 

James

 

 

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jose Osinde
Date:
Subject: Re: Select on partitioned table is very slow
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory than psql client