RE: extended statistics n-distinct on multiple columns not used when join two tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Pang (chaolpan)
Subject RE: extended statistics n-distinct on multiple columns not used when join two tables
Date
Msg-id PH0PR11MB519198036EB5D09B3D19BE52D655A@PH0PR11MB5191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: extended statistics n-distinct on multiple columns not used when join two tables  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Thanks  for your information, yes, with multiple columns equal join and correlation , looks like extended statistics could  help reduce “significantly rows estimation”. Hopefully it’s in future version.

 

James

 

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 7:29 PM
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>; James Pang (chaolpan) <chaolpan@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: extended statistics n-distinct on multiple columns not used when join two tables

 

 

 

út 13. 6. 2023 v 13:26 odesílatel David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> napsal:

(moving to -hackers)

On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 21:30, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> út 13. 6. 2023 v 11:21 odesílatel James Pang (chaolpan) <chaolpan@cisco.com> napsal:
>>      When join two table on multiple columns equaljoin, rows estimation always use selectivity = multiplied by distinct multiple individual columns, possible to use  extended n-distinct statistics on multiple columns?
>>
>>     PG v14.8-1, attached please check test case with details.
>
> There is not any support for multi tables statistic

I think it's probably worth adjusting the docs to mention this. It
seems like it might be something that could surprise someone.

Something like the attached, maybe?

 

+1

 

Pavel

 


David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: extended statistics n-distinct on multiple columns not used when join two tables
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example