RES: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Carlos H. Reimer
Subject RES: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected
Date
Msg-id PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKGEMEDFAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Yes, it is the 8.0.8 version.

You mean that changes to /etc/localtime should not reflect in the
to_timestamp behavior? Strange, why does to_timestamp behavior changed here
when the /etc/localtime was overlaped?

Well, maybe the PG refresh I´ve done after changing the /etc/localtime did
it (pg_ctl restart).

Anyway, if it will not look at the /etc/localtime, how PG will discover the
DST changes?

Thank you in advance!

Carlos


> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Enviada em: terça-feira, 17 de outubro de 2006 00:02
> Para: carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br
> Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br> writes:
> > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the
> /etc/localtime to relect
> > the following timezone:
>
> Um ... what PG version are you working with?  8.0 and up don't pay
> attention to /etc/localtime, because they have their own timezone info.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jimmy Zhang"
Date:
Subject: [ANN] VTD-XML 1.7 released
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Aother tablespace permission issue (was Re: Permission problem ...)