RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
Date
Msg-id OSCPR01MB149666A2245E574AFCF543315F574A@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Fujii-san,

> +1 to focusing on the 0001 patch.
> 
> Since this isn't a bug fix, I'm not sure back-patching is strictly necessary.
> That said, it does improve consistency and test coverage, e.g., by adding checks
> like help text length, so I'd be fine with back-patching if others see value in it.

Initially I thought this was helpful even for back branches, but it is not
100% needed.
No objections even if it is only applied to master - it can check new features in
future.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: failover logical replication slots
Next
From: Sergey Sargsyan
Date:
Subject: Proposal for Improving Concurrent Index Creation Performance