Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory
Date
Msg-id OSCPR01MB1496660969357E7D16EF4FF12F5E6A@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

Per my understanding, track_commit_timestamp must be on the new instance,
otherwise it would be removed when new instance starts. Is it correct?
If so, should we detect the difference and do some warnings/errors here?
Or it is just the user's responsibility?

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: The ability of postgres to determine loss of files of the main fork
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory