Dear Doruk,
> That sounds reasonable. I’ve updated the patch and added more
> information to the documentation covering the topics you mentioned.
> I also added a Caution block so potential users won’t miss it. I hope
> this patch meets your expectations.
Can you explain more why we must extend the SQL interface? I read your use
case [1], and looks like that a new type of background worker is introduced in
your system. If so, why doesn't the worker directly call C-lang interface
replorigin_session_setup()?
Personally considered, SQL functions are usable by unfamiliar users so that this
change may be dangerous. It is better if developers can use C APIs instead.
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMPB6wckvkKrXVPH5j8Ske2cVedkb-TRLdnOb5e74zYM1CynGw%40mail.gmail.com
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
