On Monday, July 5, 2021 10:32 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 at 11:02:01AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Rather than RfC, the appropriate status seems like it should be
> > Rejected, as otherwise it's just encouraging someone to ultimately
> > waste their time rebasing and updating the patch when it isn't going
> > to ever actually be committed.
>
> Yes, agreed with that.
Thanks for paying attention to this thread.
This cannot be helped but I've made the patch status as you suggested,
because I judged the community would not accept this idea.
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
