Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date
Msg-id OSBPR01MB488826DACCFEDB8BD00D7C0CED399@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thursday, June 3, 2021 7:07 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 AM osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
> <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for providing the patch.
> > I have updated your patch to include some other viewpoints.
> >
> 
> I suggest creating a synchronous replication part of the patch for
> back-branches as well.
You are right. Please have a look at the attached patch-set.
Needless to say, the patch for HEAD has descriptions that depend on
the 2pc patch-set.


Best Regards,
    Takamichi Osumi
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't
Next
From: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep