Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: Determine parallel-safety of partition relations for Inserts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Determine parallel-safety of partition relations for Inserts
Date
Msg-id OSBPR01MB29828EFDA11E1EDA45865C81FEA40@OSBPR01MB2982.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Determine parallel-safety of partition relations for Inserts  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: Determine parallel-safety of partition relations for Inserts  ("Hou, Zhijie" <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> Good question. I think if we choose to have a separate parameter for
> DML, it can probably a boolean to just indicate whether to enable
> parallel DML for a specified table and use the parallel_workers
> specified in the table used in SELECT.

Agreed.


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Determine parallel-safety of partition relations for Inserts
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: evtfoid and evtowner missing in findoidjoins/README