RE: doc: should pg_createsubscriber be grouped as a client application? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: doc: should pg_createsubscriber be grouped as a client application?
Date
Msg-id OS9PR01MB12149EF54C4800843291071D4F5EF2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread
In response to doc: should pg_createsubscriber be grouped as a client application?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: doc: should pg_createsubscriber be grouped as a client application?
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Peter,

> Note that the latter includes pg_basebackup, pg_receivewal, and
> pg_recvlogical, which feel generally similar to pg_createsubscriber.

Hmm, but similar command pg_upgrade was included in the server app page.

The page [1] defined that server commands are the command can be run on the same
server with the postgres server process. IIRC, the command was categorized as
"Server Application" because it assumed standby is running on the same machine.

But... I think the command is located on the border between the server and the client.
We should hear other opinions too.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/reference-server.html

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_table_ddl() to reconstruct CREATE TABLE statements
Next
From: Henson Choi
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition