RE: Introduce XID age based replication slot invalidation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Introduce XID age based replication slot invalidation
Date
Msg-id OS9PR01MB121490BA24FFD0AFF85C7FF81F553A@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce XID age based replication slot invalidation  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Introduce XID age based replication slot invalidation
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Bharath,

Thanks for re-working the project.

While seeing the old discussion, I found that Robert Haas was agaist the XID-based
invalidation, because it's difficult to determine the cutoff age [1].
Can you clarify your thought against the point? Are you focusing on solving the
wraparound issues, not for bloated instance issue?
The code may not be accepted unless we got his agreement.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZTbaaEjSZUG1FL0mzxAdN3qmXksO3O9_PZhEuXTkVnRQ@mail.gmail.com

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions
Next
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: PoC: Add condition variable support to WaitEventSetWait()