On Wed, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:15 AM I wrote:
> The comments by Sawada-San sound reasonable to me.
> After doing check, I found that padding in HEAD is the same as in REL14.
> So I change the approach of patch for HEAD just like the patch for REL14.
Also attach the back-branch patches for REL10~REL13.
(REL12 and REL11 patch are the same, so only post one patch for these two
branches.)
The patch for HEAD:
HEAD_v18-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-large.patch
The patch for REL14:
REL14_v2-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-large-.patch
The patch for REL13:
REL13_v1-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-large-.patch
The patch for REL12 and REL11:
REL12-REL11_v1-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-large-.patch
The patch for REL10:
REL10_v1-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-large-.patch
BTW, after doing check, I found that padding in REL11~REL13 are similar as HEAD
and REL14 (7 bytes padding after fast_forward). But in REL10, the padding is
different. There are three parts padding behind the following member variables:
- 4 bytes after options
- 6 bytes after prepared_write
- 4 bytes after write_xid
So, in the patches for branches REL11~HEAD, I add the new variable after
fast_forward. In the patch for branch REL10, I add the new variable after
prepared_write.
For each version, the size of the structure does not change after applying the
patch.
Regards,
Wang wei
