Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: Logical replication timeout problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Logical replication timeout problem
Date
Msg-id OS3PR01MB62750BF8A900D051BDA5C45E9E2D9@OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Logical replication timeout problem  (Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Jan 28, 2022 at 19:36 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com> wrote:
> shouldn't we use receiver_timeout in place of wal_sender_timeout because de
> problem comes from the consummer.
Thanks for your review.

IMO, because it is a bug fix on the publisher-side, and the keepalive message
is sent based on wal_sender_timeout in the existing code. So keep it consistent
with the existing code.

Regards,
Wang wei

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - perl embedding
Next
From: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Logical replication timeout problem