RE: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication
Date
Msg-id OS3PR01MB5718D92596A0289DC6908A0594D49@OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication
List pgsql-hackers
> From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for
> > > the same.
> > >
> >
> > I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as
> > this is not reported by any user and we have found it during code
> > review so it seems either users don't have an exact use case or they
> > haven't noticed this yet. What do you people think about back-patching?
> 
> Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch.

I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
passed regression test.

Best regards,
Hou zj

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?