On Thursday, September 2, 2021 2:36 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com
> <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > 3. When using '\dn+', I noticed that the list of publications only contains the
> > publications for "SCHEMA", "FOR ALL TABLES" publications are not shown. Is it
> designed on purpose?
> > (The result of '\d+' lists the publications of "SCHEAME" and "FOR ALL TABLES").
> >
> > For example:
> > create schema sch1;
> > create table sch1.tbl(a int);
> > create publication pub_schema for all tables in schema sch1;
> > create publication pub_all_tables for all tables;
>
> I'm not sure if it is intentional or not, Do you want to post the
> question in a separate thread and see if that should be handled?
>
Sorry, maybe I didn't make my last question clearly enough.
In HEAD(where schema level is not supported for publication), there is no publication
information in the result of '\dn+'.
With this schema patch, '\dn+' shows the publications related to the schema, but ALL
TABLES publications are not shown. Do you think we should add ALL TABLES publications, too?
Regards
Tang
