RE: A doubt about a newly added errdetail - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: A doubt about a newly added errdetail
Date
Msg-id OS0PR01MB5716AB25C89C674ACB3F9F1894529@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: A doubt about a newly added errdetail
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday, September 26, 2022 4:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> 
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:03 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-Sep-26, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 1:10 PM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > ERROR:  cannot use column list for relation "%s.%s" in publication "%s"
> > > > DETAIL:  Column lists cannot be specified in publications containing FOR
> TABLES IN SCHEMA elements.
> > >
> > > This looks mostly good to me. BTW, is it a good idea to add ".. in
> > > publication "%s"" to the error message as this can happen even
> > > during create publication?
> >
> > Hmm, I don't see why not.  The publication is new, sure, but it would
> > already have a name, so there's no possible confusion as to what this
> > means.
> >
> > (My main change was to take the word "publication" out of the phrase
> > "publication column list", because that seemed a bit strange; it isn't
> > the publication that has a column list, but the relation.)
> >
> 
> Okay, that makes sense.

+1

> >
> > > If so, I think we can change the nearby message as below to include
> > > the same:
> > >
> > > if (!pubviaroot &&
> > > pri->relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
> > > ereport(ERROR,
> > > (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> > > errmsg("cannot use publication column list for relation \"%s\"",
> >
> > WFM.
> >
> 
> Okay.

While reviewing this part, I notice an unused parameter(queryString) of function
CheckPubRelationColumnList. I feel we can remove that as well while on it. I
plan to post a patch to fix the error message and parameter soon.

Best regards,
Hou zj

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: A doubt about a newly added errdetail
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Differentiate MERGE queries with different structures