RE: row filtering for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: row filtering for logical replication
Date
Msg-id OS0PR01MB57168DF26BC060D3F1F9B2AC94509@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: row filtering for logical replication  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday, January 7, 2022 3:40 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
> Below are some review comments for the v60 patches.
> 
> 1e.
> "Subsequent UPDATE or DELETE statements have no effect."
> 
> Why won't they have an effect? The first impression is the newly updated tuple
> now matches the filter, I think this part seems to need some more detailed
> explanation. I saw there are some slightly different details in the header
> comment of the pgoutput_row_filter_update_check function - does it help?

Thanks for the comments ! I have addressed all the comments except 1e which
I will think over it and update in next version.

Best regards,
Hou zj

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: ICU for global collation