Re: BUG #6238: ECPG converts "long long" to long on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jim.Gray@Bull.com
Subject Re: BUG #6238: ECPG converts "long long" to long on Windows
Date
Msg-id OF779EC7E6.81DFF908-ON0725791F.005F5A30-0725791F.005F67A7@us-phx1.az05.bull.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #6238: ECPG converts "long long" to long on Windows  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
>Did you also change the variable definition to long long?

Yes





Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>=20
10/04/2011 05:15 AM

To
Jim Gray <jim.gray@bull.com>
cc
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Subject
Re: [BUGS] BUG #6238: ECPG converts "long long" to long on Windows






Hi Jim,

> Postgres 9.1.1 installed on a Windows XP PC.
> Running ECPG with "long long" data type specified in the SQL DECLARE=20
SECTION
> results in "long" being used instead.  The same input file works OK on=20
Linux

This suggests that HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT was not defined during ecpg build.=20
Or in
other words ecpg thinks long long is not supported.

> with Postgres 9.0.3   Manually changing the data type to "long long" in=
=20
the
> ECPG output file on Windows:
> ECPGt_long_long,&(_cpp_i_pkd1),(long)1,(long)1,sizeof(long long) --=20
results
> in run time error "unsupported data type".  I am using MS Visual C++=20
Express

Did you also change the variable definition to long long?

> 2010 on Windows, which accepts "long long" to mean the same thing as
> __int64, but ECPG doesn't recognize the later.
> May be related to BUG #5464: ecpg on 64bit system converts "long long"=20
to
> "long"

Well, this bug is (at least I don't know otherwise) fixed for more than a=
=20
year.
Maybe the configure test doesn't work on Windows? I don't know.

Michael
--=20
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! For=E7a Bar=E7a! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Jim.Gray@Bull.com
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #6237: Hang during install database initialization
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] One-click installer, Windows 7 32-bit, and icacls.exe