Re: tuning questions - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Matt Clark
Subject Re: tuning questions
Date
Msg-id OAEAKHEHCMLBLIDGAFELMEFAEEAA.matt@ymogen.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tuning questions  (Jack Coates <jack@lyris.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> I ended up going back to a default postgresql.conf and reapplying the
> various tunings one-by-one. Turns out that while setting fsync = false
> had little effect on the slow IDE box, it had a drastic effect on this
> faster SCSI box and performance is quite acceptable now (aside from the
> expected falloff of about 30% after the first twenty minutes, which I
> believe comes from growing and shrinking tables without vacuumdb
> --analyzing).

Hmm.  I wonder if that could be related to the issue where many IDE drives have write-caching enabled.  With the write
cacheenabled 
fsyncs are nearly immediate, so setting fsync=false makes little difference...





pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jack Coates
Date:
Subject: Re: tuning questions
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: tuning questions