RE: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . . - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Snow
Subject RE: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . .
Date
Msg-id NHEALMDKDACEIPBNOOOCEEKICCAA.als@fl.net.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to unique row identifier data type exhausted . . .  (Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de>)
Responses Re: unique row identifier data type exhausted . . .
List pgsql-general
> It feels like there should be some *really* obvious answer to this
> question, and I'll find myself whacking my forehead in self-abasement
> and out of sheer relief to have found the answer to a problem that
> should not have bothered me in the first place since the answer is too
> self-evident . . . however, it is bothering me: what happens if the data
> type that you've chosen to uniquely identify a row is exhausted? If, for
> instance you use int4 and you've had your couple billion deletes and
> inserts on the table and the next nextval('seq') . . . well, what
> exactly happens and how do they do it? Admittedly, 10^9 is a big number
> but it is far from out of the question that you'd reach it on a really
> busy database (can't think of a real-world example but that ought to be
> a moot point), not to mention oids since they are unique across an
> entire database.

I am curious to know how difficult it would be (if at all) to change the
type that oid represents, to a 64 bit number. C'mon guys, this isn't the 90s
any more!


- Andrew




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Brett W. McCoy"
Date:
Subject: Re: storing large amounts of text
Next
From: Andrew Schmeder
Date:
Subject: Large objects...