RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Date
Msg-id NCBBKBDOOHHEJCJHLLPAOEMIINAA.ler@lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Working on it.

Give me a couple of hours.

LER

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:04 AM
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Larry Rosenman
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? 


Olivier PRENANT <ohp@pyrenet.fr> writes:
> Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> used.

That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
that even knows SSL exists.  Larry, can you confirm this behavior?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?