On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:03:56 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> > As for one opinion on why reply-to headers shouldn't be munged, see:
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> Also note that the PG lists do *not* insert any reply-to headers
> (I quite agree with the above link's reasons why the list bot should
> not do so). Any reply-to you see in a list message was put there
> by the message author.
<AOL>
Me Too!
</AOL>
i've been running internet mailing lists since the mid-80s, and there
are so many things that explicit reply-to breaks or places at risk
that it's not even funny.
just say NO to reply-to!
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
