RE: [External] Re: WAL Replication query - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Sacheen Birhade
Subject RE: [External] Re: WAL Replication query
Date
Msg-id MW4PR20MB45255296CA7F85445C000A16F3369@MW4PR20MB4525.namprd20.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-admin
Yes, Laurenz. You are right.

-----Original Message-----
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> 
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 12:23 PM
To: Sacheen Birhade <sacheen.birhade@veritas.com>; KK CHN <kkchn.in@gmail.com>; pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query

On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 06:44 +0000, Sacheen Birhade wrote:
> If replication is in asynchronous then there will be data loss, right Laurenz?

Why?  The data will perhaps show up on the standby a little later, but why is that data loss?  Remember that the
questionwas about replication, and there was no mention of failover.
 

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query
Next
From: Sacheen Birhade
Date:
Subject: finding best possible new master in case of failover?