Re: Validation of db post minor upgradation - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From vignesh kumar
Subject Re: Validation of db post minor upgradation
Date
Msg-id MN0PR20MB4912459EC0AE8A7F24620BFF87322@MN0PR20MB4912.namprd20.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Validation of db post minor upgradation  (Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-admin
Ok i see your concern. Minor upgrade just need replacing binaries with newer ones. Which changing the image tag will do the work for you. Eventually you need to know what are all the changes that went through from previous minor build version to new ones so that you can test that particular component 

From: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmail.com> on behalf of Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 3:16:00 PM
To: vignesh kumar <vigneshkumar.venugopal@outlook.com>
Cc: Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar.dba09@gmail.com>; Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Validation of db post minor upgradation
 
Hi,

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 06:49:47AM +0000, vignesh kumar wrote:
> Pg_upgrade should infact take care of the upgrade. That's why it's
> better to do a pg_upgrade check before doing actual upgrade.. hope
> this helps.

pg_upgrade is for major upgrades. This thread is about minor/maintenance
upgrades if I understood correctly.


Michael

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: M Sarwar
Date:
Subject: Re: Aws RDS official certification
Next
From: "Narendran .j"
Date:
Subject: Ora2pg migration