Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug? - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Bo?ena Potempa
Subject Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?
Date
Msg-id MKEIIFDEFPOPHIPFIFJCEEGADHAA.Bozena.Potempa@otc.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-odbc
>If it is implemented in the server I would implement it.
>However, it isn't implemented in the server and so
>there's no recommended way to store 0s in strings now.
>Even if 0s are stored in strings accidentally like your
>example shows, there are few code which take them into
>account and they would be lost before long. As for me
>I've never minded 0s in strings in the backend coding.
>
>I don't think your request is unreasonable but what
>you should request the change first seems from the
>backend side.

I will ask on pgsql-hackers and then return to ODBC.

Thank you very much for your help.

Bozena Potempa


pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: "Graham Vickrage"
Date:
Subject: Text field truncation problem
Next
From: Joan Picanyol i Puig
Date:
Subject: Re: insert into view with a defined rule fails from MSAccess