Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug? - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Bo?ena Potempa
Subject Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?
Date
Msg-id MKEIIFDEFPOPHIPFIFJCAEFDDHAA.Bozena.Potempa@otc.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-odbc
[..]
>Hmm the difference may come from (non-)multibyte mode.

I don't think so. My PostgreSQL on Linux installation is standard,
without support for multibyte characters, without support for
any national characterset and sorting. Just installed
'as is' on the fresh RedHat 7.3.

>> Now I am not sure which behaviour is correct (and planned
>> by PostgreSQL developers).
>
>As far as I see PostgreSQL couldn't handle non-null-terminated
>strings correctly.

OK. But I think, that even if some earlier versions of PostgreSQL
do not support 0s in strings then later versions will support them.
So ODBC driver should not cut strings containing zeroes, but
insert/read data entirely making usage of provided length.
Is it implemented like that?

And again: could you ask somebody with 7.2.3 on Linux to
run my test and confirm the results?

Best regards,
Bozena Potempa


pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: "Schnetzer, Jerry"
Date:
Subject: Duplicate Table Names in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Benjamin Scherrey
Date:
Subject: Can't get more than 255 chars out of memo field in Access 97.