Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Japin Li
Subject Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber
Date
Msg-id MEYP282MB16699CE73E3338D67651891CB6BF9@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 23:10, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 22:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> There's another issue here: the subscriber can run user-defined code
>>> (in triggers), while AFAIK the sender cannot.
>
>> Sorry, I'm not sure about this.  Could you give me an example?
>
> If you're doing logical replication into a table that has triggers,
> the replication worker has to execute those triggers.
>

Does that mean we should use the subscriber's settings to set the
replication's parameter (e.g. datestyle)?  If we do this, it might
loss precision (for example: extra_float_digits on publisher is 3
and on subscriber is -4), is this accpted?

-- 
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix memory corruption in pg_shdepend.c