Re: Typo about subxip in comments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Japin Li
Subject Re: Typo about subxip in comments
Date
Msg-id MEYP282MB166994010FABEFF20823BF76B6029@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Typo about subxip in comments  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Typo about subxip in comments
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 12:12, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 2:45 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Maybe a wrong plural in XidInMvccSnapshot().
>>
>>      * Make a quick range check to eliminate most XIDs without looking at the
>>      * xip arrays.
>>
>> I think we should use "xip array" instead of "xip arrays".
>>
>
> I think here the comment is referring to both xip and subxip array, so
> it looks okay to me.
>

Yeah, it means xip in normal case, and subxip in recovery case.

>> Furthermore, if the snapshot is taken during recovery, the xip array is
>> empty, and we should check subxip array. How about changing "xip arrays"
>> to "xip or subxip array"?
>>
>
> I don't know if that is an improvement. I think we should stick to
> your initial proposed change.

Agreed.  Let's focus on the initial proposed change.

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Making Bitmapsets be valid Nodes