Re: Add IS_INDEX macro to brin and gist index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Japin Li
Subject Re: Add IS_INDEX macro to brin and gist index
Date
Msg-id MEAPR01MB303101194936F6A1C7A203BEB689A@MEAPR01MB3031.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add IS_INDEX macro to brin and gist index  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
Responses Re: Add IS_INDEX macro to brin and gist index
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 at 09:55, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> On 2026-Jan-16, Japin Li wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the test. After rethinking, I agree — that BRIN/GIST index-type
>> check is useless.
>>
>> OTOH, why don't we just do it the same way as the btree index functions?
>>
>>     brin_page_items(relname text, blkno bigint);
>
> Operational usefulness.  If you have a corrupt page in a production, you
> can extract it from there with get_raw_page() and move it to another
> system to do low-level investigation.  If you only have the interface
> you suggest, you force the researcher to access the production system
> (and run potentially dangerous tools), which may be best avoided.
>

Sorry, I didn't get your mind.  We can still use get_raw_page().
> --
> Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Next
From: Jakub Wartak
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_plan_advice