On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 11:19, "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 10:33 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Huh, the startup process is among the most crucial things to monitor?
>>
>
> Good point. Fixed.
>
> After collecting some suggestions, I'm attaching a new patch contains the
> following changes:
>
> - patch was rebased
> - include Alvaro's patch (v2-0001) [1] as a basis for this patch
> - add ioworker as new backend type
> - add startup as new backend type per Andres suggestion
> - small changes into documentation
>
>> I don't know what I think about the whole patch, but I do want to voice
>> *strong* opposition to duplicating a list of all backend types into multiple
>> places. It's already painfull enough to add a new backend type, without having
>> to pointlessly go around and manually add a new backend type to mulltiple
>> arrays that have completely predictable content.
>>
>
> I'm including Alvaro's patch as is just to make the CF bot happy and to
> illustrate how it would be if we adopt his solution to centralize the list of
> backend types. I think Alvaro's proposal overcomes the objection [2], right?
>
If we set the log level for all backend types, I don't think a generic log
level is necessary.
--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
