RE: Re: Re: Order question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joseph
Subject RE: Re: Re: Order question
Date
Msg-id LOBBJCNOBBADICNFFOCMGELGHGAA.lters@mrtc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Order question  ("Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net>)
List pgsql-general
I suppose you could use the oid column as long as it was not wrapping
(starting to count over).

Joseph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Mitch Vincent
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 6:24 PM
> To: Mike Castle; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Re: Re: Order question
>
>
> Sure, I was just wondering if there was some PG internal value I could use
> (and I should have said that in my email)..
>
> Thanks for the suggestion though, I appreciate it..
>
> -Mitch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Castle" <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>
> To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 6:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Order question
>
>
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:58:35PM -0500, Mitch Vincent wrote:
> > > I just set the row with j.inv_id to 1, I'd like it to be ordered above
> the
> > > row with j.jobtitle in it -- is that possible?
> >
> > make a trigger that updates a time stamp and order by that?
> >
> > mrc
> > --
> >        Mike Castle       Life is like a clock:  You can work constantly
> >   dalgoda@ix.netcom.com  and be right all the time, or not work at all
> > www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day.  -- mrc
> >     We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen
> >
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joern Raffel
Date:
Subject: nested transactions in 7.1 ?
Next
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Triggers and RI-style behavior.