Re: JDBC 3.0 - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Joe Shevland
Subject Re: JDBC 3.0
Date
Msg-id HEECIHEEJDBMCCGMGIOBMEIGCHAA.jshevland@j-elite.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JDBC 3.0  (Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
Responses Re: JDBC 3.0
List pgsql-jdbc
Here's a link:

http://www.j-elite.com/pgsql/tmp/jdbc3.tgz

Its about ~22k compressed. It could be a little ugly though: its the output of the diff command run from WinCVS, so I'm
notsure if its that clean. If there are space/tab probs etc I'll make the changes on the bsd box lurking under the
tableand get a better diff. 

Also, this can't be applied on top of everything and just work, I'm fairly sure the methods added to
xa.ClientConnectionwill break earlier jdbc builds. I didn't check whether the xa package was built conditionally, maybe
wecould swap in the appropriate class in a similar way to Driver.java.in. I also changed the 'test' target to
'test-jdbc2',and haven't added any tests yet. 

Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Dave Cramer
> Sent: Thursday, 2 May 2002 12:31
> To: Joe Shevland
> Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC 3.0
>
>
> Joe,
>
> Can you send the context diff to the list?
>
> Dave
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 22:09, Joe Shevland wrote:
> > I've built a JDBC 3 driver from the current CVS sources (added
> a org.postgresql.jdbc3 package and some changes to build.xml).
> Its mainly just placeholder methods. I think someone else might
> have submitted a patch for this though, but I can put up a link
> for a context diff. Otherwise, the additions to the PGBlob and
> PGClob classes for JDBC 3.0 might be worthwhile.


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC 3.0
Next
From: "Joe Shevland"
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC 3.0