Re: BUG #18880: Can't have a database without having postgres as a db_name and username - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Subject Re: BUG #18880: Can't have a database without having postgres as a db_name and username
Date
Msg-id GV0P278MB041900D5193C687311D8588ED2AA2@GV0P278MB0419.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #18880: Can't have a database without having postgres as a db_name and username  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
>Like I said I can't have a database with another db_name and username I find
>that frustrating because I need to change these to class myself for my work
>I need multiple database with differents name and username

>Thank you for the support in advance and I hope you will solve that faster!

Can you please describe what you are trying to do exactly? You definitely can have multiple databases with their own owners.

Regards
Daniel

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18146: Rows reappearing in Tables after Auto-Vacuum Failure in PostgreSQL on Windows
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18880: Can't have a database without having postgres as a db_name and username