Re: Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Subject Re: Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL
Date
Msg-id GV0P278MB041900C909F1C97C047E0633D2A1A@GV0P278MB0419.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-docs
>>> "Another way to archive is to use a custom archive module as the archive_library"
>>
>> shouldn't this read:
>> "Another way to archive this is to use a custom archive module as the archive_library"

>That would be worse than the original.  What is "this"?
>I'd suggest "Another way to archive WAL ...".

I've misread archive as achieve. Sorry for the noise

Regards
Daniel


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing word? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: ^@ operator vs start_with function