Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOKEEPCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I completely agree with Bruce here. Requiring an initdb for every beta
> release significantly reduces the number of people who will be willing
> to try it out -- so initdb's between betas are not disasterous, but
> should be avoided if possible.

But it does mean that 7.3 to 7.3 pg_dump gets a good testing...

You could almost make it mandatory to have an initdb during beta :)

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)