> BTW there seems a misunderstanding about my posting.
> I'm not objecting to add attisdropped pg_attribute column.
> They are essentially the same and so I used macros
> like COLUMN_IS_DROPPED in my implementation so that
> I can easily change the implementation to use isdropped
> pg_attribute column.
> I'm only correcting the unfair valuation for my
> trial work.
Hiroshi, I totally respect your trial work. In fact, I'm relying on it to
do the attisdropped implementation. I think everyone's beginning to get a
bit cranky here - I think we should all just calm down.
Chris
