> Yeah. This is a pretty self-contained problem, it just needs someone
> who's motivated to work on it. Mostly what we need is to understand how
> we want to extend the previously-agreed-to I/O behaviors for IPv4 inet
> and cidr types into the v6 domain. (Or should we back up and ask if the
> inet/cidr division still makes sense in the v6 world? I hope so, but
> if not we should face up to it...)
Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'???
Chris
