Re: Should this require CASCADE? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Should this require CASCADE?
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAEBLCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should this require CASCADE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > With all this dependency stuff, what happens with the ALTER
> TABLE / DROP NOT
> > NULL syntax we came up with?
>
> Nothing, AFAICS.  NOT NULL doesn't have any dependency implications.

What about the primary keys that I mentioned?  In the current
implementation, it's restrict-only.

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should this require CASCADE?
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: Should this require CASCADE?