Re: NFS vs. PostgreSQL on Solaris - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas F. O'Connell
Subject Re: NFS vs. PostgreSQL on Solaris
Date
Msg-id FB50821A-AC96-420B-AD63-53221B2FE5A8@o.ptimized.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NFS vs. PostgreSQL on Solaris  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: NFS vs. PostgreSQL on Solaris  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Apr 26, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tf@o.ptimized.com> writes:
>> 1. What aspect of postgres' memory usage would create an "out of
>> memory" condition?
>
> I'm guessing you ran the box out of swap space --- look into what
> other
> processes got started as a result of adding the NFS mount, and how
> much
> memory they wanted to eat.
>
>> 3. What would cause postgres to die from a signal 11?
>> I've also got a core file if that's necessary for further forensics.
>
> Send gdb backtrace, please.
>
>             regards, tom lane

Unfortunately, the production build in question is lacking --enable-
debug. :(

--
Thomas F. O'Connell

optimizing modern web applications
: for search engines, for usability, and for performance :

http://o.ptimized.com/
615-260-0005


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: Questions about TSearch2 and PG 8.2
Next
From: Tom Allison
Date:
Subject: pgsql and Mac OS X