Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id FA1BABEF-426E-4454-B099-A63EB509FAE4@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Well, I think that that's exactly the question here: if we do something
> in core, will it foreclose options for people who want to do add-ons?

Why would it? They would just have to use a different name.

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2