Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Brad DeJong
Subject Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date
Msg-id F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB5AB6D@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Brad DeJong <Brad.Dejong@infor.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc

Vladimir wrote:

> Well, current milestone has slipped a bit

> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/milestones, however there are just a

> couple of issues due.

> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/690 "executeBatch vs

> serverprepared=0" -- needs review

> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/611 "feat: allow byte[] and String to

> be accessed as .getLob, and .getClob" -- test should be reviewed (e.g.

> assert messages added)

 

I just looked at pull 690 and I think the change has unintended side effects. Comment added to the pull.

 

 

 

 

 

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Next
From: Jorge Solórzano
Date:
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion