Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brad DeJong
Subject Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Date
Msg-id F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB546DC@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Change "even large" to "even larger" because it is used in a comparison.

> ... a reasonable starting value for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> is 25%
> of the memory in your system. There are some workloads where even large settings
> for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> are effective, ...

... are some workloads where even larger settings ...

Regards,
Brad DeJong

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Abbas Butt
Date:
Subject: Re: Using a latch between a background worker process and a thread
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication WIP