Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Casey Duncan
Subject Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time
Date
Msg-id F83D28A8-8BDE-4632-99B7-744BFFA7C0D7@pandora.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> Am Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2006 02:56 schrieb Euler Taveira de  
>> Oliveira:
>>> This simple patch lets someone specifies the xlog directory at  
>>> initdb
>>> time. It uses symlinks to do it, and create and/or set  
>>> permissions at
>>> the directory as appropriate.
>
>> We already had this functionality in initdb a few versions ago.   
>> Did you
>> review why it was removed?
>
> The discussion thread seems to start here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-08/msg00306.php
>
> As best I can tell the objections came from the fact that Thomas had
> implemented it as a postmaster-start-time switch, which made it a
> foot-gun because you could mistakenly start the postmaster with a
> different XLOG than you were using before.  That would not apply to a
> symlink-made-by-initdb approach.  All this is doing is formalizing
> something we already suggest people do by hand...

I guess the downside there is that it won't work on platforms that  
don't support symlinks, whereas the postmaster switch would. Not that  
I condone using such platforms ;^)

-Casey


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS