Re: SELECT'ing a function call - Mailing list pgsql-general

From omid omoomi
Subject Re: SELECT'ing a function call
Date
Msg-id F711Gj03oHMwVN7miR900008e06@hotmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SELECT'ing a function call  ("Jared H. Hudson" <jhudson@forefronthosting.com>)
List pgsql-general
Command: create rule
Description: define a new rule
Syntax:
        CREATE RULE rule_name AS ON
        { SELECT | UPDATE | DELETE | INSERT }
        TO object [WHERE qual]
        DO [INSTEAD] [action|NOTHING|[actions]];


HTH
Omid

>From: "Jared H. Hudson" <jhudson@forefronthosting.com>
>To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
>Subject: [GENERAL] SELECT'ing a function call
>Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:25:21 -0500
>
>
>I would like to be able to define a table with 1 column containing user
>names,
>and the next column being a dynamically generating function that returns a
>user's quota.
>
>I think I see how to create the shared object, and the SQL function. But,
>how
>do I create a table that uses a function for a column based on the value of
>another
>column.
>
>For example, I tried:
>
>CREATE TABLE test (
>     num1 INTEGER,
>     num2 INTEGER DEFAULT add_one('num1')
>);
>
>But that said that pg_atoi doesn't understand num1 -- so apprenting atoi is
>interpreting
>num1 as a string, so I tried ...DEFAULT add_one(num1) which gave a
>different
>error.
>
>Is this even possible? To have a "trigger" based on a select statement. I
>looked at the SQL
>TRIGGER command and it seems to only work for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE. I
>need a "trigger"
>for SELECT's.
>
>Thanks,
>Jared H.
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions
Next
From: Ed Loehr
Date:
Subject: Re: order by + union (was: query syntax change?)